All by itself, methane isn't very exciting. It's a colorless,  odorless gas and the simplest member of the alkane series of  hydrocarbons. Its biggest claim to fame is that, as the main constituent  of natural gas, it's useful as a source of energy.
Recently, however, geologists have discovered a type of methane  that has piqued their curiosity. Part of its unusual character is how it  exists in its natural state -- trapped inside a cage of ice. Even more  intriguing is how much of this frozen methane seems to be locked away in  the Earth's crust. Some estimates indicate that as much as 700  quadrillion (700 × 1015) cubic feet (20 quadrillion cubic  meters) of methane are encased in ice and trapped in seafloor sediments  all over the world [source: Tarbuck]. That's twice as much carbon as Earth's other fossil fuels combined.
That's not just mud (pictured). It's mud containing methane  hydrate, icelike crystals that form at low temperatures and high  pressure. And it could be a future energy source. See more alternative fuel pictures. The discovery of this new type of methane, what scientists call methane hydrate,  has led to two important questions. The first is pragmatic: Will it  burn like ordinary methane? It turns out it will. If you take a piece of  methane hydrate -- it looks like hard-packed snow -- and touch a  lighted match to it, the sample will burn with a reddish flame. And if  that's the case, it could be used to heat homes, fuel cars and generally  power energy-hungry nations such as Japan, the United States, India and  China. Recent data suggest that just 1 percent of Earth's methane  hydrate deposits could yield enough natural gas to meet America's energy  needs for 170,000 years [source: Stone].
The second question is partly an ethical consideration: Should we,  as a global community trying fervently to develop clean, renewable  energy, embrace one of the fossil fuels that got us into trouble in the  first place? Science can't answer that question. It can, however, reveal  the challenges and risks that face countries hoping to take advantage  of methane hydrate. One of the most significant challenges is finding  efficient ways to extract the frozen fuel. More troubling are potential  catastrophes -- ranging from massive underwater landslides to a runaway  greenhouse effect -- related to methane mining.
In this article, we'll explore all the positives and negatives of  methane hydrate. We'll look at its relatively brief history, as well as  how it fits in some possible future scenarios. And, of course, we'll  examine the basic science behind this so-called "flammable ice."
 Fire and Ice: The Chemistry of Methane Hydrate
Frozen fuel is the catchy name for a family of substances known as gas hydrates.  The gas in question is natural gas, a mixture of hydrocarbons, such as  methane, propane, butane and pentane. Of these, methane is by far the  most common component and one of the most-studied compounds in  chemistry.
Like all hydrocarbons, methane contains only two elements -- carbon and hydrogen. It is an example of a saturated hydrocarbon,  or a molecule composed entirely of single bonds and therefore the  maximum number of hydrogen atoms allowed. The general formula for  saturated hydrocarbons is CnH2n+2. Methane only has one carbon atom, so its chemical formula is CH4. Chemists describe this shape as a tetrahedron.Methane is a colorless, odorless, combustible gas produced by  bacterial decomposition of plant and animal matter. It forms in a  process shared by all fossil fuels. First, marine plants and animals die  and fall to the seafloor. Next, mud and other seafloor sediments cover  the decomposing organisms. The sediments put a great deal of pressure on  the organic matter and begin to compress it. This compression, combined  with high temperatures, breaks down the carbon bonds in the organic  matter, transforming it into oil and natural gas.
Generally, this methane -- what geologists describe as "conventional"  methane -- is located beneath the Earth's surface. To get to it,  workers must drill through rock and sediment and tap into the methane  deposits to release the gas. Then they pump it to the surface, where  it's transported through pipes across the country.
Methane can also form unconventionally if the sediments producing  it are located about 1,640 feet (500 meters) below the ocean surface.
The near-freezing temperatures and high pressure of these conditions  causes the methane to become encased in ice. The methane doesn't bond  chemically with the water. Instead, each tetrahedral methane molecule  sits inside a crystalline shell made of ice. This unique substance is  known as methane hydrate, and as soon as it reaches warmer temperatures and lower pressures, the ice melts away, leaving behind pure methane.
Geologists discovered naturally occurring methane hydrate only  recently, but chemists have known about it for years.
A Brief History of Methane Hydrate
The history of gas hydrates can be traced back to Humphrey Davy, a  chemist from Cornwall, England, who identified chlorine as an element in  1810.
Davy and his assistant, Michael Faraday, continued to work  with chlorine throughout the early 1800s, mixing the green gas with  water and cooling the mixture to low temperatures.
It's very  likely that Davy observed the strange solid that resulted as chlorine  atoms became encased in ice crystals, but Faraday gets official credit  for the discovery. In 1823, Faraday issued a report describing the  strange substance and called it chlorine clathrate hydrate. Other types  of clathrates, each involving a guest compound locked inside the lattice  structure of a host, were soon discovered, but they remained a  laboratory curiosity.
Then, in the 1930s, natural-gas miners began to complain of an  icelike material clogging pipelines exposed to cold temperatures.  Scientists determined that this material was not pure ice, but ice  wrapped around methane. They wasted no time trying to find ways to  prevent hydrates from forming and turned primarily to chemicals, such as  methanol or monoethylene glycol. Since then, mining companies have  added these materials to their natural-gas pipelines to inhibit hydrate  formation.In the 1960s, scientists discovered that methane hydrate, or "solid  natural gas," existed in the Messoyakha gas field in western Siberia.  This was significant because naturally occurring gas hydrates had never  been found before. Geologists and chemists arrived in the vast basin and  began to study the conditions in which the hydrates were forming. They  found that sub-permafrost sediments were rich in hydrates and began to  look for similar deposits in other high-latitude regions. Soon, another  team of researchers found methane hydrate in sediments buried deep below  the North Slope of Alaska.
Based on these early findings, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)  and the Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory  conducted extensive research between 1982 and 1992, revealing that  methane hydrate deposits could be found in offshore sediments as well.  Suddenly, what had once been a curiosity and an industrial nuisance  looked like it might be a significant resource. In the mid-1990s, Japan  and India took the lead in methane hydrate research, with the goal of  finding more deposits and developing ways to extract the trapped methane  economically. Scientists have since discovered methane hydrate deposits  in numerous locations, including the Mackenzie River delta in Canada  and the Nankai Trough off the coast of Japan.
Up next, we'll consider the impact methane hydrate could have on the world's energy supply.
 The Potential of Frozen Fuel
Once scientists began looking for methane hydrate deposits, they  weren't disappointed. They found them beneath Arctic permafrost and   beneath the seafloor, especially in areas where one tectonic plate  slides over another. These regions are known as subduction zones  because the edge of one plate moves beneath another.
For example, off  the coast of Washington and Oregon, the Juan de Fuca plate is sliding  underneath the North American plate. Like a piece of wood being drawn  across the blade of a plane, the sediments, including hydrates, of the  Juan de Fuca plate are removed by the rocky crust of the North American  plate. This creates a ridge of hydrates that runs parallel to the coast.
Hydrate deposits have also been found in regions where large  ocean currents meet. Blake Ridge is a formation located off the coast of  South Carolina, in water ranging from 6,562 to 15,748 feet (2,000 to  4,800 meters) deep. Geologists believe the ridge formed during the  Oligocene epoch, about 33.7 to 23.8 million years ago.The Greenland Sea  opened up during this time, allowing huge amounts of cold, dense water  to flow south along the Atlantic coast. As this cold water ran headlong  into warm water being carried northward on the Gulf Stream, the currents  slowed down and dropped large amounts of sediment. Organic material  buried in these sediments eventually gave rise to a large amount of  methane hydrate.
How much of this frozen fuel exists at Blake Ridge and other sites  around the world? Some estimates put the amount of methane locked away  in hydrates at anywhere from 100,000 trillion to 300,000,000 trillion  cubic feet (2,832 trillion to 8,495,054 trillion cubic meters). Compare  that to the 13,000 trillion cubic feet (368 trillion cubic meters) of  conventional natural gas reserves remaining on the planet, and you can  understand why jaws in the scientific community have dropped [source: Collett].
Of  course, finding the hydrate deposits is one thing. As we'll see in the  next section, getting them out -- and doing it safely -- is another  thing entirely.
 The Risky Business of Mining Methane Hydrate
The potential rewards of releasing methane from gas hydrate fields must  be balanced with the risks. And the risks are significant. Let's start  first with challenges facing mining companies and their workers. Most  methane hydrate deposits are located in seafloor sediments. That means  drilling rigs must be able to reach down through more than 1,600 feet  (500 meters) of water and then, because hydrates are generally located  far underground, another several thousand feet before they can begin  extraction. Hydrates also tend to form along the lower margins of  continental slopes, where the seabed falls away from the relatively  shallow shelf toward the abyss. The roughly sloping seafloor makes it  difficult to run pipeline.
Even if you can situate a rig safely, methane hydrate is unstable  once it's removed from the high pressures and low temperatures of the  deep sea. Methane begins to escape even as it's being transported to the  surface. Unless there's a way to prevent this leakage of natural gas,  extraction won't be efficient. It will be a bit like hauling up well  water using a pail riddled with holes.
Believe it or not, this leakage may be the least of the worries.  Many geologists suspect that gas hydrates play an important role in  stabilizing the seafloor. Drilling in these oceanic deposits could  destabilize the seabed, causing vast swaths of sediment to slide for  miles down the continental slope. Evidence suggests that such underwater  landslides have occurred in the past (see sidebar), with devastating  consequences. The movement of so much sediment would certainly trigger  massive tsunamis similar to those seen in the Indian Ocean tsunami of  December 2004.
But perhaps the biggest concern is how methane hydrate mining could  affect global warming. Scientists already know that hydrate deposits  naturally release small amounts of methane. The gas works itself skyward  -- either bubbling up through permafrost or ocean water -- until it's  released into the atmosphere. Once methane is in the atmosphere, it  becomes a greenhouse gas even more efficient than carbon dioxide at  trapping solar radiation. Some experts fear that drilling in hydrate  deposits could cause catastrophic releases of methane that would greatly  accelerate global warming.
Does that make methane from hydrate  fields off-limits? This is the question scientists from all over the  world are trying to answer. 
The Future of Frozen Fuel
In 1997, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiated a research  program that would ultimately allow commercial production of methane  from gas hydrate deposits by 2015. Three years later, Congress  authorized funding through the Methane Hydrate Research and Development  Act of 2000. The Interagency Coordination Committee (ICC), a coalition  of six government agencies, has been advancing research on several  fronts. Much of what we know about the basic science of methane hydrate  -- how it forms, where it forms and what role it plays, both in seafloor  stabilization and global warming -- has come from the ICC's research.
Interesting ideas about how to extract the methane from hydrates  efficiently are also emerging. Some experts propose a technique in which  miners pump hot water down a drill hole to melt the hydrate and release  the trapped methane. As the methane escapes, it is pumped to the  seafloor through a companion drill hole.
From there, submarine pipelines  carry the natural gas ashore. Unfortunately, such pipelines would need  to travel over difficult underwater terrain. One solution is to build a  production facility on the seafloor so it is situated near the hydrate  deposits. As methane escapes from the heated sediments, workers in the  plant would refreeze the gas to form "clean" methane hydrate. Submarines  would then tow the frozen fuel in huge storage tanks to shallower  waters, where the methane could be extracted and transported safely and  efficiently.Is all of this necessary? Won't renewable energy sources make it a  waste of time to pursue another nonrenewable fossil fuel so vigorously?  Realistically, fossil fuels will still be an important component of the  world's overall energy mix for decades to come. According to the Energy  Information Administration (EIA), total U.S. natural gas consumption is  expected to increase from about 22 trillion cubic feet (0.622 trillion  cubic meters) today to about 27 trillion cubic feet (0.76 trillion cubic  meters) in 2030. Global natural gas consumption is expected to increase  to 182 trillion cubic feet (5.15 trillion cubic meters) over the same  period [source: EIA]. Tapping into the methane locked away in hydrates will obviously play a key role in meeting that demand.
That  means the frozen fuel from methane hydrate can buy more time as  scientists search for alternatives to power our planet. Think of it as  an important stepping-stone in our transition to cleaner, greener energy  sources. 
 by "environment clean generations"

Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar