Coal-Fired Power Plants  Coal-fired power plants, such as this one in the Conesville, Ohio, are  by far the 'dirtiest' means of producing electricity in terms of amount  of carbon released into the atmosphere. This has made coal a primary  target in the effort to keep total emissions of carbon dioxide below the threshold  that will yield two degrees celcius of warming. Scientists have settled  identified this threshold  as the marker for avoiding "catastrophic"  consequences from climate change. 
It’s no secret that the world is warming, but a new report  published by the World Wildlife Fund suggests we may not have as much  time to mull solutions as we think. If the world doesn’t commit to green  technologies by 2014, the report says, runaway global warming and  economic meltdown are all but unstoppable.
Written by a group at the experts at Australian insurance consultancy  Climate Risk, the transformation to a low-carbon world requires an  effort “greater than any other industrial transformation witnessed in  our history.” At minimum, the world needs to embrace – and by embrace,  they mean to the absolute maximum – low-carbon technologies by 2014.
A  minimum growth in all green industries of 22% a year is necessary to  achieve that goal, according to their research, and that’s just to cut  emissions to 63% of 1990 levels by 2020.
But the WWF has more ambitious plans: a reduction to 80% of 1990  levels by 2050, an industrial revolution that would require growths  between 24% and 29% every year. This is the best way to stave off the  doomsday scenario of 2 degree Celsius (about 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit)  warming across the board, according to the report. Unfortunately, we  have a long way to go.
The research relied on complex Monte Carlo models of industrial  growth, resource allocation, and technological advance, but the basic  reasoning is thus: total greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere are  estimated 463 parts per million. Scientific research shows that a good  comfortable spot for our atmosphere is about 400 ppm. But at around 475  ppm, a threshold that we are dangerously close to crossing, runaway  climate change becomes increasingly more likely, at which point it will  be difficult if not impossible to put the brakes on global warming.
Now, having said all that, it’s important to note that this isn’t the  first doomsday climate change scenario to emerge, especially recently.  Just today, two British Cabinet ministers showed off their own doomsday  map, detailing rising sea levels and submerged cities that would result  from a 4 degree Celsius (7.2 degree Fahrenheit) rise in global temps.
President Obama has pledged a greenhouse gas reduction of 80 percent by  2050 (an easy promise to make with a two term limit), while the EU has  stated that it will match those efforts if a deal is sealed at  December’s UN climate change conference in Copenhagen.
But the WWF report, if taken seriously, places a new urgency on the  issue. For one, most climate strategies rely upon an incremental  ratcheting down of emissions while slowly transitioning to low-carbon  sources of energy all the way up to 2050.
According to WWF, this  schedule simply won’t hack it. Further, WWF points out that only three  of the 20 green technologies they’ve reviewed are moving forward fast  enough to hit the 2014 deadline: wind, solar, and biodiesel. Other  technological initiatives like low-carbon agriculture, sustainable  forestry, and other forms of green energy generation are sorely lacking.  The outlook, it seems, is dim.
What happens if we miss the deadline? According to the WWF report,  from there things become increasingly difficult. Post-2014, low-carbon  industries will need to grow at a minimum of 29% per year, and that’s  just to have a better than 50% chance of staving off that nearly  4-degree Fahrenheit spike in global temperatures.
But the news isn’t all  bad: while the transition will be tough, long term investment in green  energies should pay off, with renewable energy savings alone in the  period between 2013 and 2050 expected to hit $47 trillion if we cut by  80 percent, a positive number among many grim figures.
Naturally, models are models and scenarios are but scenarios. The  most important takeaway is this: no matter whether you believe in  runaway warming or not, technology is the way forward in our warming  world, and right now we are woefully under-prepared for the transition  to a low-carbon future.
by "environment clean generations"

Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar